home/ atoms/ prepared-vs-improv-modular-sequencing

A live modular rig can be built around spontaneous algorithmic sequencing or around pre-programmed banked sequences

There are two contrasting ways to build the sequencing core of a live techno rig. An improvisation-oriented system relies on algorithmic trigger sequencers with built-in patterns that auto-run from a clock, so it is very hard to go wrong and offers wide, spontaneous variety with little preparation. A prepared-oriented system instead uses several step sequencers run at different clock divisions plus a 303-style pitch sequencer whose pitch banks are programmed ahead of the set, trading spontaneity for specific, practised sequences and fills. Neither is superior; the choice matches the performer’s desired balance of surprise versus control, and the two approaches can be mixed.

Examples

Improv rig: algorithmic trigger sequencers plus a combiner auto-running the groove. Prepared rig: four step sequencers at divided clocks plus a 303-style sequencer with banked pitch patterns.

Assessment

Describe the difference between an algorithmic/improv sequencing rig and a prepared/banked one, and which performance style each favours.

“303-style sequencer. Since we already have triggering covered, we can create lon”
corpus · we-have-the-techno-logy-building-a-eurorack-system-for-live · chunk 5